Category Archives: television

On Feminism and Women Who Rock

Woman With A Guitar – Maria Blanchard

The Spark

I was sitting in the bleacher seats in one of the music classrooms at UMass, and sort of staring top-down at the Music 101 professor. She walked around the podium and said, “Now, some of you have been asking why we’re not covering the sections of women composers, the ones listed in the book. Well, the truth is that they’re just not very good.” My breath caught in my throat. She continued with a smile, “And it’s just more important that we cover the influential composers.”

This was roughly twelve years ago, my freshman year. At the time, I was still hellbent on becoming a singer-songwriter. Hearing the professor–a woman!–say what she did made me feel sick to my stomach. I felt embarrassed. For her, for the class. She might as well have just said: “What women have accomplished in music isn’t worth our time. They’ve made no impact on the world, so we ignore them.” (For the record, there are over 800 listed on Wikipedia alone.) Was that going to happen to me? Was my music just… not important enough to be anything other than a footnote?

To say that women are missing from what most people know as Classical music is an understatement. While there are some standouts, including Felix Mendelssohn’s own sister Fanny, by and large Western Classical music as taught (like most of the Humanities) is dominated by men. And why are men “better”? The major contributing factor: education. Not to mention support. And the non-existence of birth control for women. And their horrifically short lifespans. But that’s sort of not the point. The point is that regardless of the calibur of their work when compared to their male counterparts, women’s accomplishments matter — in fact, they matter so much precisely because they were done against the odds.

Moving Forward

A few years later, when I was in graduate school, I had somewhat of an opposite issue. Most people assumed I was a feminist leaning literary critic because, I guess, I am a woman. Also, I talk a great deal. But I didn’t identify as a feminist critic. As a medievalist, I was fond of the school of New Historicism, which seeks to try its best and read literature in the context of its era, and includes a great deal of historical research. I always replied to the question of feminist criticism in the negative. But in spite of my initial reply, by the end of my degree I found myself writing my thesis on a very feminist subject, the role of Guinevere in William Morris’s poem “The Defence of Guenevere” as well as looking at her in Marie de France’s lai, “Lanval.” Ultimately, I was drawn to one of the most scandalous and often discussed women in English literary history, throwing around terms like “agency” and “proto-feminism” a great deal. So much for that!

Now, I’m an author. And while my first novel featured a male protagonist, nothing since then has. I write women because I am one, because I feel like our stories still need to be told. Because we need feminism now. As a recent interview with Caitlin Moran, hilarious and brilliant author of How To Be A Woman points out, women of my generation and older are often afraid of being labeled feminists. It’s a bad word. It means you’re a bitch. Or a lesbian. Or a hippy. Or you hate men. Or you aren’t feminine. Or whatever. Right?

Moran puts it succinctly:

What part of liberation for women is not for you? Is it the freedom to vote? The right not to be owned by the man that you marry? The campaign for equal pay? Vogue by Madonna? Jeans? Did all that stuff just get on your nerves?

It’s easy to forget how far we’ve come in so short a time. Marriage was never about love or about choice: It was about wealth. Dowries. Status. Political alliances. Until the early 20th century, it was practically unheard of that a woman would have a say in her own marriage, let alone have a career. Pioneers like Mary Shelley (and her mother Mary Wollstonecraft), Ada Lovelace, the Bronte sisters, and Jane Austen, had to work against incredible odds to do what they loved. That they produced anything of meaning is nothing short of astonishing.

Women Who Rock

Doing research for Rock Revival I’ve been delving into the history of rock music as best I can. Sure, there are bands with women in them. In the indie scene it’s more common these days, but mainstream popular bands tend to fall into two categories: entirely composed of women and often done so with marketing in mind (The Go-Gos, The Runaways, The Bangles, etc.); or fronted by a woman (The Pretenders, Blondie, Hole, Evanescence). The Revivals, my fictional band, are comprised of men and women (initially two women and three men, a la Fleetwood Mac, Talking Heads, or Belle & Sebastian) which is the hardest category to find. No matter how you slice it, rock music is still very much a boys’ game, and apparently boys and girls playing together isn’t a terribly marketable concept.

Quoth Moran, rather apropos to the subject of women rocking and marketing:

“In the early ’90s, it was grunge, everybody was fully clothed. Alanis Morissette was one of the biggest artists in the world, never wore make up, wearing Doc Marten boots, and then the Spice Girls turn up, and suddenly it all looks a bit burlesque, suddenly they’re the biggest band in the world. … And as you go all the way through the ’90s, the clothes just fall off the women until you get to the year 2000, and Britney Spears is just wearing a snake.”

It got me thinking about equal footing in the music industry and why there are so few visible female rock musicians. And I think it has a lot to do with lack of empowerment. Take my experience. In spite of the fact I was born 20 years after the 60s, I was something of an anomaly as a female musician. It’s not exactly the norm to hear girls chat about electric guitars or dream about Fender Princeton Chorus amps while leafing through Musician’s Friend.

I remember “talking the talk” a few times around male musicians and sound guys (particularly older ones), and they often expressed a sort of surprise and amusement. Was I posing? Was I serious? Was I any good? “Yeah, how long have you been playing?” “What kind of guitar do you play?” Just like in geek circles, when you’re a female musician you’re often held up to more scrutiny, as if you’re some sort of impostor. And in many cases I think that scrutiny leads to self-consciousness and safe decisions, like starting your own band rather than joining one, or selecting to work with other women. Or becoming a folk singer instead of a rock star. (There are, thankfully, exceptions.)

And how about instrumental choice? I wonder, why did I never branch out from rhythm guitar to something else? Why didn’t I try lead? I think the sad answer to that is I didn’t think I had it in me, as a woman, as a musician. Because, by and large, girls don’t play lead guitar. I’m not flashy, I’m not a “performer” in that sense. Who was I to get up there and shred? (And it hasn’t gone away! My fictional band is real to my experience. Kate and Sara, like me, were encouraged with music but never pushed to be lead guitarists, or gutsy lead singers. Why don’t either of them play lead? I guess I feel like the odds of that happening, even now, are slim to none, in a band that finds a big audience.)

Carry On

I have a daughter. She’s barely three months old — but even before she was born I was worrying about what challenges she’s going to face. Now I find myself thinking about this stuff a whole lot more than I did when my son was born. Because no matter how hard I try, she’ll have a different experience than he will. Pieces like Mur Lafferty’s “Dear Daughter” really get to the heart of what I’ve been contemplating. If women today are so afraid to use the F-word, so worried about what other people might think when it comes to their own empowerment and pride, what does that mean for my daughter’s generation? If we, as mothers and fathers and friends can’t give them the courage to get out there and shred, if our communities can’t get behind them, then all the work that women like my grandmother (who was a first-wave feminist) — and other women in rock, and those who rock — have done won’t mean a thing. It’s a scary prospect.

I don’t want to make this terribly political, but I can’t go without saying that there are people here, in my country and around the world, who don’t believe women really can do these things. That it’s just not in us. Some of their motivations are religious, others experiential, some plain misogynistic. But these are big decision-makers and policy-pushers, CEOs and ad executives, people controlling the stream of what we hear and see. There are people who still see women as baby-makers and child-rearers, and creatures who really should just stay home (because that’s the best for everyone) and surely aren’t capable of raising children by themselves, let alone doing face-melting solos in front of thousands of people.

You know what? We are bigger than they are. If we decide to work at home to be with our kids, that’s our choice. If we decide to put our kids in daycare and go to work and kick ass and take names that way, that’s also our choice. That is what feminism is about. Not about being a bitch, or a liberal, or a “femi-Nazi”. It’s breaking free from the outdated societal constraints we’ve struggled under for so long. It’s about having a choice.

I want my daughter to feel the power of music. If she decides to, I want her to plug in her Les Paul, hear the sizzle of the cord coming to life, and feel every note course through her. I want her to feel the hot lights on her face, to smell the funk of backstage, to see the faces of a crowd when they make that connection. If she wants to strut, I want her to strut. If she wants to scream a primal scream and dazzle the audience with her talent, I want her to revel in every moment. I want her to be a proud, to do what I never did. And I want the world to rise up and celebrate every moment with her. Maybe that’s a lot to ask. But I think it can happen.

The pulse of rock ‘n’ roll beats in all of us, and it’s about power and strength and love and heartbreak and sex and experiences and empowerment. It’s not just a boys’ game. If anything we should be giving girls Telecasters when they’re ten and encouraging them to rock, to tell their stories, and to change the world.

We are not the labels we’ve been given. We are not wallflowers. We deserve to be heard. We are women who rock.

Confessions of a vampire virgin.

Okay, so I’ll get this right out in the open: I don’t do vampires. I’ve never read much about them, I’ve never been glamored by their mythologies, and I’ve never had a desire to write about them. It’s not personal, really. I mean–well, it’s personal to me, but this goes back before any of the whole vampire mania hit the literary community and culture at large. I do remember seeing Interview With a Vampire at some point, but I was so besotted with hobbits and Tolkien at the time that it really had no impact on me.

And I have to admit, while I’m a general fan of Joss Whedon, Buffy never did it for me. Just couldn’t get into it.

So, I’m a little perplexed at this point in my life to find myself extremely captivated by True Blood. I’ve never read any Charlaine Harris, but the show seems to hit a chord with me. Maybe part of it is living in the South for the better part of the last decade, but it feels both familiar and strange, and is highly entertaining.

Oddly enough, I dreamed (during my sleep, y’know) of a whole series of books based around a suburban housewife vampire mom… don’t know if I’d ever have the time or the inclination to write it, but watching the series definitely has given me some interesting ideas.

The only vampire fiction I’ve ever read (here comes an amusing confession) is Salem’s Lot and the first half or so of Dracula. And I’ve got to admit, I think it’s kind of fun being uniformed on a topic that has so pervaded a huge chunk of our culture. It also means I’m nowhere near as sick of vampires as most writers! (Not that it’ll influence my writing any time soon, but y’know.)

Am I missing out? This fantasist is admittedly a very selective reader these days. Any particular books or short stories you think I really should read? I’m heading to the coast and (hopefully) Canada this summer, so I’m on the lookout for good paperbacks.

TV Review: Legend of the Seeker

Let’s clear something up first. I’m not an avid TV watcher. I don’t stake out stations like I used to, planning my evenings around programming. When I watch a show, it’s usually on DVD and most likely cancelled–a la Firefly–or on its way out, like Battlestar Galactica. And my route to the show usually involves someone, like in the case of Lost, insisting to me that this MUST BE SEEN. Because of this filter of friends and a distance from commercial interruption, I think I tend to hit right most of the time. Except with Heroes. What has been seen cannot be unseen.

So, it was through the casual mention of a pair of friends of mine that I realized, with a little prodding, that indeed Terry Goodkind’s Sword of Truth series was being made into what I assumed was a mini-series. I’m not sure why I thought that, considering the sheer girth of all the books–one alone wouldn’t fit in a mini-series, let alone the whole lot of them.

This past weekend, fingers tired from writing and plotting a WIP, I decided to take a TV break while my husband continued to blow things up in Fallout 3. Enter Hulu. I saw the little teaser and figured: okay, sword and powerful women, pretty costumes. Yeah, I’ll watch the first episode.

Um, so, yeah. In three days I watched all nine episodes. And as a huge fantasy geek (but not a purist, I don’t think) I thought a little review would be helpful for those interested in the show who may not have yet seen it, or know what it’s about.

A few caveats. I haven’t read the books since I was fifteen, and the memory is a little groggy. I also have a weak spot for impossible romances, dynamic sword fights, and wizards. In the face of those weaknesses I can ignore a great deal. I also like New Zealand. A lot. So if this is biased, so be it. I’ve warned you.

The story is basic as fantasy story lines go. A young man named Richard finds his life turned upside down when he runs into a beautiful woman from across the boundary named Kahlan; she is searching for someone called the Seeker, who is prophesied to kill the evil overlord Darken Rahl. Rahl of course has been reigning terror on the Midlands (that place over the Boundary) for the last 23 years, and is a baddie to end all baddies.

Richard, of course, discovers that he is this Seeker, but in the process also learns his father is not his father, and that a strange old man has been watching him for the last 23 years (in the books, he knows Zedd quite well, just doesn’t know he is, well, a wizard). Madness, murder, mayhem, and many adventures ensue.

Except, well, The Legend of the Seeker (FYI, still not sold on the name… sounds a little too hokey for me, and a bit too much like the last Susan Cooper movie and the famous kid on a broomstick) is really a re-imagining. They’ve taken the heart of the books, lightened it up significantly–especially in the character of Kahlan, who comes across as much warmer than I recall–and turned it into an episodic series with swashbuckling, magic-making, and of course, a dash of impossible romance.

I honestly couldn’t figure out what was so good upon watching the first few episodes. Yes, the costumes are gorgeous–rivalling some of the stuff from the Rings movies (I wonder if some of the folks working on it, in fact, worked on that movie, too). The fight scenes? I’ve never seen such convincing and beautifully shot scenes before on a television series. I watched, and loved, the Hercules/Xena franchises back in the 90s, but let’s face it: fighting was not their forte.

Then, well, I saw Ted Raimi. Where Ted Raimi is, you know Sam’s somewhere. And lo and behold, a quick look at IMDB revealed that yes, in fact, he’s an executive producer. So there we go. Not surprising that the filming is so impressive, not to mention that the sense of humor is left in tact (and it’s humor along the lines of Firefly, not goofball like Hercules, thankfully). And, I discovered, Terry Goodkind himself is involved and is helping mold this particular imagining, which I think is a huge contributing factor to its quality. Writers are often too aloof to be involved, or strictly forbidden from involvement!

True, there are lots of Richard without a shirt shots, cheesy homages, and a few unconvincing actors. But by and large, the relatively unknown cast holds their own. And I’ve got to say, Bridget Regan pretty much looks exactly like Kahlan as I imagined her, not to mention her awesome costume. Her chemistry with Craig Horner is great, and that’s really central to the whole story. Not to mention Bruce Spence who, if you look closely, is the same dude who was the Mouth of Sauron in The Return of the King. Thankfully he’s considerably nicer in this particular incarnation, and though his Zedd towers over the one I’d had in mind, he captivates the wily, weird, and wacky Zeddicus Zu’l Zorander with near-perfect pitch.

I’ve noticed the quality of the episodes has actually improved consistently throughout the telling, and I’m admittedly hooked for a while. Though I’m a little worried they’re spending so much money on the show (but not the website… agh, ABC and Disney, this was the best you came up with?!) and that it airs on Sunday nights–but, well, for the meantime I’m enjoying myself. It’s been a long time since a true high fantasy TV show.

Check it out if you’ve got the chance. I’m always concerned about shows I like biting the bullet, but at very least they’ve filmed 22 episodes. Tempted as I am to drag out Goodkind’s tomes again, I think I’ll wait a while though… well, that journey is another post in and of itself!

You can watch Legend of the Seeker on Hulu, or on ABC depending on your local schedule.

(N.B. OH! And holy crap. I just realized Craig Parker, who plays Darken Rahl, was Haldir in LoTR… oh dear. The blond wig was confusing, but I knew I’d seen that smirk somewhere…)